0. Introduction. Let Mn be a n-dimensional minimally immersed submanifold of M, Q> 1. Throughout this paper M is taken to be one of the simply connected space forms with curvature 1, 0, or-1, ie Mfn+ f sn+ f, Rn+ f, or Hn+ f. Given a point p EM, let rp (x) be the dis-tance function on M, we denote the restriction of rp to M as the extrinsic distance function on M. For any a> 0, we define the extrinsic ball cen-tered at p with radius a by

We prove flatness of complete Riemannian planes and cylinders without conjugate points under optimal conditions on the area growth.

For a one-parameter family (V, {i}pg i=1) of general type hypersurfaces with bases of holomorphic n-forms, we construct open covers V = Spg i=1 Ui using tropical geometry. We show that after normalization, each i is approximately supported on a unique Ui and such a pair approximates a Calabi-Yau hypersurface together with its holomorphic n-form as the parameter becomes large. We also show that the Lagrangian fibers in the fibration constructed by Mikhalkin [9] are asymptotically special Lagrangian. As the holomorphic n-form plays an important role in mirror symmetry for Calabi-Yau manifolds, our results is a step toward understanding mirror symmetry for general type manifolds.

In this paper, employing a new inequality, we show that under certain curvature pinching condition, the strictly convex closed smooth self-similar solution of $\sigma_k^{\alpha}$-flow must be a round sphere. We also obtain a similar result for the solutions of $F=-\langle X, e_{n+1}\rangle \, (*)$ with a non-homogeneous function $F$. At last, we prove that if $F$ can be compared with $\frac{(n-k+1)\sigma_{k-1}}{k\sigma_{k}}$, then a closed strictly $k$-convex solution of $(*)$ must be a round sphere.

A generation of symbols asserted for n ≥ 0 in the proof of Theorem 3.3 of the original paper in fact only holds for n > 0, thus undermining the proof of the theorem. A new version of Section 3.5 of the original paper is given, culminating in a corrected proof of Theorem 3.3. The author thanks Deepak Khosla for pointing out the gap in the previous version of the proof.