A recently proposed class of multivariate Public-Key Cryptosystems, the Rainbow-Like Digital Signature Schemes, in which successive sets of central variables are obtained from previous ones by solving linear equations, seem to lead to efficient schemes (TTS, TRMS, and Rainbow) that perform well on systems of low computational resources. Recently SFLASH (C^{∗−}) was broken by Dubois, Fouque, Shamir, and Stern via a differential attack. In this paper, we exhibit similar algebraic and diffential attacks, that will reduce published Rainbow-like schemes below their security levels. We will also discuss how parameters for Rainbow and TTS schemes should be chosen for practical applications.

This paper presents a time-area efficient hardware architecture for the multivariate signature scheme Rainbow. As a part of this architecture, a high-performance hardware optimized variant of the well-known Gaussian elimination over GF(2^l) and its efficient implementation are presented. The resulting signature generation core of Rainbow requires 63,593 gate equivalents and signs a message in just 804 clock cycles at 67 MHz using AMI 0.35μm CMOS technology. Thus, Rainbow provides significant performance improvements compared to RSA and ECDSA.

The SFLASH signature scheme stood for a decade as the most successful cryptosystem based on multivariate polynomials, before an efficient attack was finally found in 2007. In this paper, we review its recent cryptanalysis and we notice that its weaknesses can all be linked to the fact that the cryptosystem is built on the structure of a large field. As the attack demonstrates, this richer structure can be accessed by an attacker by using the specific symmetry of the core function being used. Then, we investigate the effect of restricting this large field to a purely linear subset and we find that the symmetries exploited by the attack are no longer present. At a purely defensive level, this defines a countermeasure which can be used at a moderate overhead. On the theoretical side, this informs us of limitations of the recent attack and raises interesting remarks about the design itself of multivariate schemes.

TTM (tame transformation method) is a type of multivariate public key cryptosystem. In 2007, the inventor of TTM proposed two new instances of TTM to resist the existing attacks, in particular, the Nie et al attack. The two instances are claimed to achieve a security of 2109 against Nie et al attack. Through computation, we found that the instance II satisfied First Order Linearization Equations. After finding all linearization equations, we can perform a ciphertext-only attack to break it.

In this paper, we study how the algebraic attack on the HFE multivariate public key cryptosystem works if we build an HFE cryptosystem on a finite field whose characteristic is not two. Using some very basic algebraic geometry we argue that when the characteristic is not two the algebraic attack should not be polynomial in the range of the parameters which are used in practical applications. We further support our claims with extensive experiments using the Magma implementation of F_4, which is currently the best publicly available implementation of the Gröbner basis algorithm. We present a new variant of the HFE cryptosystems, where we project the public key of HFE to a space of one dimension lower. This protects the system from the Kipnis-Shamir attack and makes the decryption process avoid multiple candidates for the plaintext. We propose an example for a practical application on GF(11) and suggest a test challenge on GF(7).