In this paper, we prove the DonohoStark uncertainty principle for locally compact quantum groups and characterize the minimizer which are bi-shifts of group-like projections. We also prove the HirschmanBeckner uncertainty principle for compact quantum groups and discrete quantum groups. Furthermore, we show Hardy's uncertainty principle for locally compact quantum groups in terms of bi-shifts of group-like projections.

Given a fixed$p$≠2, we prove a simple and effective characterization of all radial multipliers of $ \mathcal{F}{L^p}\left( {{\mathbb{R}^d}} \right) $ , provided that the dimension$d$is sufficiently large. The method also yields new$L$^{$q$}space-time regularity results for solutions of the wave equation in high dimensions.

No abstract uploaded!

Structures and functions of proteins play various essential roles in biological processes. The functions of newly discovered proteins can be predicted by comparing their structures with that of known functional proteins. Many approaches have been proposed for measuring the protein structure similarity, such as the template-modeling (TM)-score method, GRaphlet (GR)-Align method as well as the commonly used root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measures. However, the alignment comparisons between the similarity of protein structure cost much time on large dataset, and the accuracy still have room to improve. In this study, we introduce a new three-dimensional (3D) Yau–Hausdorff distance between any two 3D objects. The (3D) Yau–Hausdorff distance can be used in particular to measure the similarity/dissimilarity of two proteins of any size and does not need aligning and super- imposing two structures. We apply structural similarity to study function similarity and perform phylogenetic analysis on several datasets. The results show that (3D) Yau–Hausdorff distance could serve as a more precise and effective method to discover biological relationships between proteins than other methods on structure comparison.

In this paper, we introduce a motivic version of To¨en’s derived Hall algebra. Then we point out that the two kinds of Hall algebras in the sense of To¨en and Kontsevich–Soibelman, respectively, are Drinfeld dual pairs, not only in the classical case (by counting over finite fields) but also in the motivic version. Consequently they are canonically isomorphic. All proofs, including that for the most important associative property, are deduced in a self-contained way by analyzing the symmetry properties around the octahedral axiom, a method we used previously