We prove Kudla-Rallis conjecture on ¯rst occurrences of local theta correspondence, for all irreducible dual pairs of type I and all local ¯elds of characteristic zero.

We use the signal function from RLWE key exchange to derive an efficient zero knowledge authentication protocol to validate an RLWE key p=as+e with secret s and error e in the Random Oracle Model (ROM). With this protocol, a verifier can validate that a key presented to him by a prover P is of the form p=as+e with s,e small and that the prover knows s. We accompany the description of the protocol with proof to show that it has negligible soundness and completeness error. The soundness of our protocol relies directly on the hardness of the RLWE problem. The protocol is applicable for both LWE and RLWE but we focus on the RLWE based protocol for efficiency and practicality. We also present a variant of the main protocol with a commitment scheme to avoid using the ROM.

We prove$L$^{$q$}-inequalities for the gradient of the Green potential ($Gf$) in bounded, connected NTA-domains in$R$^{$n$},$n$≥2. These domains may have a highly non-rectifiable boundary and in the plane the set of all bounded simply connected NTA-domains coincides with the set of all quasidiscs. We get a restriction on the exponent$q$for which our inequalities are valid in terms of the validity of a reverse Hölder inequality for the Green function close to the boundary.

No abstract uploaded!

Consider $N$ bosons in a finite box  $ \Lambda = [0,L]^3 \subset R^3$ interacting via a two-body smooth repulsive short range potential. We construct a variational state which gives the following upper bound on the ground state energy per particle $$ \bar{lim|_{\rho \to 0} \bar{lim|_{L \to \infty, N/L^3 \to \rho} ( \ frac{e_0 (\rho) - 4\pi a \rho }{ (4\pi a)^{5/2} (\rho)^{3/2} } ) \le \frac{16}{15 \pi ^2} , $$ where $a$ is the scattering length of the potential. Previously, an upper bound of the form $C16/15\pi^2$ for some constant $C >1$ was obtained in (Erdös et al. in Phys. Rev. A 78:053627, 2008). Our result proves the upper bound of the prediction by Lee and Yang (Phys. Rev. 105(3):1119–1120, 1957) and Lee et al. (Phys. Rev. 106(6):1135–1145, 1957).