Multizeta values in positive characteristic were first introduced and studied by Thakur. He and Lara Rodr\'{\i}guez \cite{LRT} discovered and conjectured certain zeta-like families. Kuan, Lin and Yu stated more conjectures about zeta-like multizeta values in \cite{LK}. In the present paper we study and give the transparent formula for certain Anderson-Thakur polynomials. This enables us to confirm the conjectured zeta-like families.

No abstract uploaded!

The edges of a complete graph on$n$vertices are assigned i.i.d. random costs from a distribution for which the interval [0,$t$] has probability asymptotic to$t$as$t$→0 through positive values. In this so called pseudo-dimension 1 mean field model, we study several optimization problems, of which the traveling salesman is the best known. We prove that, as$n$→∞, the cost of the minimum traveling salesman tour converges in probability to a certain number, approximately 2.0415, which is characterized analytically.

We propose a new method for constructing partially hyperbolic diffeomorphisms on closed manifolds. As a demonstration of the method we show that there are simply connected closed manifolds that support partially hyperbolic diffeomorphisms. Laying aside many surgery constructions of 3-dimensional Anosov flows, these are the first new examples of manifolds which admit partially hyperbolic diffeomorphisms in the past forty years.

The finite subgroups of $GL_4(\bm{Z})$ are classified up to conjugation in \cite{BBNWZ}; in particular, there exist $710$ non-conjugate finite groups in $GL_4(\bm{Z})$. Each finite group $G$ of $GL_4(\bm{Z})$ acts naturally on $\bm{Z}^{\oplus 4}$; thus we get a faithful $G$-lattice $M$ with ${\rm rank}_\bm{Z} M=4$. In this way, there are exactly $710$ such lattices. Given a $G$-lattice $M$ with ${\rm rank}_\bm{Z} M=4$, the group $G$ acts on the rational function field $\bm{C}(M):=\bm{C}(x_1,x_2,x_3,x_4)$ by multiplicative actions, i.e. purely monomial automorphisms over $\bm{C}$. We are concerned with the rationality problem of the fixed field $\bm{C}(M)^G$. A tool of our investigation is the unramified Brauer group of the field $\bm{C}(M)^G$ over $\bm{C}$. It is known that, if the unramified Brauer group, denoted by ${\rm Br}_u(\bm{C}(M)^G)$, is non-trivial, then the fixed field $\bm{C}(M)^G$ is not rational (= purely transcendental) over $\bm{C}$. A formula of the unramified Brauer group ${\rm Br}_u(\bm{C}(M)^G)$ for the multiplicative invariant field was found by Saltman in 1990. However, to calculate ${\rm Br}_u(\bm{C}(M)^G)$ for a specific multiplicatively invariant field requires additional efforts, even when the lattice $M$ is of rank equal to $4$. There is a direct decomposition ${\rm Br}_u(\bm{C}(M)^G)= B_0(G) \oplus H^2_u(G,M)$ where $H^2_u(G,M)$ is some subgroup of $H^2(G,M)$. The first summand $B_0(G)$, which is related to the faithful linear representations of $G$, has been investigated by many authors. But the second summand $H^2_u(G,M)$ doesn't receive much attention except when the rank is $\le 3$. Theorem 1. Among the $710$ finite groups $G$, let $M$ be the associated faithful $G$-lattice with ${\rm rank}_\bm{Z} M=4$, there exist precisely $5$ lattices $M$ with ${\rm Br}_u(\bm{C}(M)^G)\neq 0$. In these situations, $B_0(G)=0$ and thus ${\rm Br}_u(\bm{C}(M)^G)\subset H^2(G,M)$. The {\rm GAP IDs} of the five groups $G$ are {\rm (4,12,4,12), (4,32,1,2), (4,32,3,2), (4,33,3,1), (4,33,6,1)} in {\rm \cite{BBNWZ}} and in {\rm \cite{GAP}}. Theorem 2. There exist $6079$ finite subgroups $G$ in $GL_5(\bm{Z})$. Let $M$ be the lattice with rank $5$ associated to each group $G$. Among these lattices precisely $46$ of them satisfy the condition ${\rm Br}_u(\bm{C}(M)^G)\neq 0$. The {\rm GAP IDs} (actually the {\rm CARAT IDs}) of the corresponding groups $G$ may be determined explicitly. A similar result for lattices of rank $6$ is found also. Motivated by these results, we construct $G$-lattices $M$ of rank $2n+2, 4n, p(p-1)$ ($n$ is any positive integer and $p$ is any odd prime number) satisfying that $B_0(G)=0$ and $H^2_u(G,M)\neq 0$; and therefore $\bm{C}(M)^G$ are not rational over $\bm{C}$.