Lagrangian Floer homology in a general case has been constructed by Fukaya, Oh, Ohta and Ono, where they construct an A-algebra or an A-bimodule from Lagrangian submanifolds. They developed obstruction and deformation theories of the Lagrangian Floer homology theory. But for obstructed Lagrangian submanifolds, the standard Lagrangian Floer homology cannot be defined. We explore several well-known homology theories on these A-objects, which are Hochschild and cyclic homology for an A-objects and ChevalleyEilenberg or cyclic ChevalleyEilenberg homology for their underlying L-objects. We show that these homology theories are well-defined and invariant even in the obstructed cases. Due to the existence of m 0, the standard homological algebra does not work and we develop analogous homological algebra over Novikov fields. We provide computations of these homology

We show that in many examples the non-displaceability of Lagrangian submanifolds by Hamiltonian isotopy can be proved via Lagrangian Floer cohomology with non-unitary line bundle. The examples include all monotone Lagrangian torus fibers in a toric Fano manifold (which was also proven by Entov and Polterovich via the theory of symplectic quasi-states) and some non-monotone Lagrangian torus fibers.

We compute the ring structure of Floer cohomology groups of Lagrangian torus fibers in some toric Fano manifolds continuing the study of [CO]. Related <i>A</i>-formulas hold for a transversal choice of chains. Two different computations are provided: a direct calculation using the classification of holomorphic discs by Oh and the author in [CO], and another method by using an <i>analogue of divisor equation</i> in Gromov-Witten invariants to the case of discs. Floer cohomology rings are shown to be isomorphic to Clifford algebras, whose quadratic forms are given by the Hessians of functions <i>W</i>, which turn out to be the superpotentials of Landau-Ginzburg mirrors. In the case of , this proves the prediction made by Hori, Kapustin and Li by B-model calculations via physical arguments. The latter method also provides correspondence between higher derivatives of the superpotential of LG mirror with