We discuss the difficulties of estimating quadratic functionals based on observations Y (t) from the white noise model Y (t) where Y (t) is a standard Wiener process on Y (t) . The optimal rates of convergence (as Y (t) ) for estimating quadratic functionals under certain geometric constraints are found. Specifically, the optimal rates of estimating Y (t) under hyperrectangular constraints Y (t) and weighted Y (t) -body constraints Y (t) are computed explicitly, where Y (t) is the Y (t) th Fourier-Bessel coefficient of the unknown function Y (t) . We develop lower bounds based on testing two highly composite hypercubes and address their advantages. The attainable lower bounds are found by applying the hardest one-dimensional approach as well as the hypercube method. We demonstrate that for estimating regular quadratic functionals [ie, the functionals which can be estimated

Generalized likelihood ratio statistics have been proposed in Fan, Zhang and Zhang [Ann. Statist. 29 (2001) 153193] as a generally applicable method for testing nonparametric hypotheses about nonparametric functions. The likelihood ratio statistics are constructed based on the assumption that the distributions of stochastic errors are in a certain parametric family. We extend their work to the case where the error distribution is completely unspecified via newly proposed sieve empirical likelihood ratio (SELR) tests. The approach is also applied to test conditional estimating equations on the distributions of stochastic errors. It is shown that the proposed SELR statistics follow asymptotically rescaled 2-distributions, with the scale constants and the degrees of freedom being independent of the nuisance parameters. This demonstrates that the Wilks phenomenon observed in Fan, Zhang and Zhang [Ann. Statist. 29

Askewing'method is shown to effectively reduce the order of bias of locally parametric estimators, and at the same time retain positivity properties. The technique involves first calculating the usual locally parametric approximation in the neighbourhood of a point x'that is a short distance from the place x where the we wish to estimate the density, and then evaluating this approximation at x. By way of comparison, the usual locally parametric approach takes x'= x. In our construction, x'-x depends in a very simple way on the bandwidth and the kernel, and not at all on the unknown density. Using skewing in this simple form reduces the order of bias from the square to the cube of bandwidth; and taking the average of two estimators computed in this way further reduces bias, to the fourth power of bandwidth. On the other hand, variance increases only by at most a moderate constant factor.

Recent proposals for implementation of kernel-based nonparametric curve estimators are seen to be faster than naive direct implementations by factors up into the hundreds. The main ideas behind the two different approaches are made clear. Careful speed comparisons in a variety of settings and using a variety of machines and software are done. Various issues on computational accuracy and stability are also discussed. Our speed tests show that the fast methods are as fast or somewhat faster than methods traditionally considered very fast, such as LOWESS and smoothing splines.

Kernel density estimates are frequently used, based on a second order kernel. Thus, the bias inherent to the estimates has an order of O(<i>h</i>²_<i>n</i>). In this note, a method of correcting the bias in the kernel density estimates is provided, which reduces the bias to a smaller order. Effectively, this method produces a higher order kernel based on a second order kernel. For a kernel function <i>K</i>, the functions W_k(x)=^k-1₁₌₀(^k_l+1)x^lK^(l)(x)/l! and [1/<i>K</i>^{(<i>k</i> 1)}(<i>x</i>)/<i>x</i> d <i>x</i>]<i>K</i>^{(<i>k</i> 1)}(<i>x</i>)/<i>x</i> are kernels of order <i>k</i>, under some mild conditions.