No abstract uploaded!

The surveys in the field of nonlinear filtering (NLF) are enumerous. Most of them are application-oriented and served as the tutorials for the practioners. The local approaches, including Kalman filter and its invariants, have already been studied from various point of views, due to its off-the-shelf implementation and wide applications. However, it cannot give good estimation of the states in highly nonlinear system or with non-Gaussian initial conditional density functions. Moreover, while the local methods only approximate the mean and variance, the global ones seek the way to directly obtain the conditional density function of the states. Consequently, all the statistical information is acquired. In this survey, we shall briefly go through the local approaches and put emphases on the existing three major global approaches: finite-dimensional NLF, sequential Monte Carlo methods (particle filter) and the {Yau-Yau's} on- and off-line solver of Duncan-Mortensen-Zakai's equation {\cite{YY_08}}. The discussions are mainly from the mathematical point of view.

Kurdyka–Łojasiewicz (KL) exponent plays an important role in estimating the convergence rate of many contemporary first-order methods. In particular, a KL exponent of 1/2 for a suitable potential function is related to local linear convergence. Nevertheless, KL exponent is in general extremely hard to estimate. In this paper, we show under mild assumptions that KL exponent is preserved via inf-projection. Inf-projection is a fundamental operation that is ubiquitous when reformulating optimization problems via the lift-and-project approach. By studying its operation on KL exponent, we show that the KL exponent is 1/2 for several important convex optimization models, including some semidefinite-programming-representable functions and some functions that involve C2-cone reducible structures, under conditions such as strict complementarity. Our results are applicable to concrete optimization models such as group-fused Lasso and overlapping group Lasso. In addition, for nonconvex models, we show that the KL exponent of many difference-of-convex functions can be derived from that of their natural majorant functions, and the KL exponent of the Bregman envelope of a function is the same as that of the function itself. Finally, we estimate the KL exponent of the sum of the least squares function and the indicator function of the set of matrices of rank at most k.

No abstract uploaded!

No abstract uploaded!