The Hamiltonian cycle problem is an important problem in graph theory and computer science. It is a special case of the famous traveling salesman problem. A signicant amount of research has been done on the special cases of nding Hamiltonian cycles in subgraphs of triangular, square and hexagonal grids. However, there is little work on more complicated grids. In this paper, we investigate the hardness of Hamiltonian cycle problem in grid graphs of semiregular tessellations, which are tessellations formed by two or more kinds of regular polygons. There are only eight semiregular tessellations, and we prove that the Hamiltonian cycle problem in all of them are NP-complete by reducing from NP-complete problems, such as the Hamiltonian cycle problem in max degree 3 bipartite planar graphs. Knowing the NP-completeness of Hamiltonian cycle problem in semiregular grids indicates that there will not be any polynomial time algorithm that solves the Hamiltonian path problem in these tessellations if NP does not equal to P, which helps show the limits of ecient motion planning algorithms and provides new information about what makes problems computationally dicult to solve.

The alternating direction multiplier method (ADMM) is widely used in computer graphics for solving optimization problems that can be nonsmooth and nonconvex. It converges quickly to an approximate solution, but can take a long time to converge to a solution of high‐accuracy. Previously, Anderson acceleration has been applied to ADMM, by treating it as a fixed‐point iteration for the concatenation of the dual variables and a subset of the primal variables. In this paper, we note that the equivalence between ADMM and Douglas‐Rachford splitting reveals that ADMM is in fact a fixed‐point iteration in a lower‐dimensional space. By applying Anderson acceleration to such lower‐dimensional fixed‐point iteration, we obtain a more effective approach for accelerating ADMM. We analyze the convergence of the proposed acceleration method on nonconvex problems, and verify its effectiveness on a variety of computer graphics including geometry processing and physical simulation.

No abstract uploaded!

No abstract uploaded!

No abstract uploaded!